Futures

Benjamin Franklin’s Humorous Essay on Flatulence: Fart Proudly, (from page 20290911.)

External link

Keywords

Themes

Other

Summary

“Fart Proudly” is an essay by Benjamin Franklin, written around 1781, addressing the topic of flatulence humor in response to a call for scientific papers from the Royal Academy of Brussels. Franklin critiques the pretentiousness of academic societies, proposing research on improving the odor of flatulence. He humorously suggests the scientific testing of farting and the development of a drug to make flatulence inoffensive. The essay was never officially submitted but circulated privately among friends. Although excluded from Franklin’s published works for a long time, it remains accessible online and inspired a modern response from the Young Academy of Belgium in 2021.

Signals

name description change 10-year driving-force relevancy
Humor in Academia Franklin’s humorous approach to a scientific topic suggests a shift in academic discourse. From serious, pretentious academia to a more humorous and approachable style. Academia may embrace humor and creativity more openly in research and discussions. A growing desire for relatability and engagement in academic communications. 4
Public Engagement with Science Franklin’s letter encourages public discourse on scientific matters through humor. From exclusive, academic discussions to broader public engagement in scientific topics. Increased citizen participation in scientific discussions and research initiatives. The democratization of science and the rise of public interest in scientific literacy. 5
Cultural Acceptance of Bodily Functions Franklin’s candid discussion of flatulence suggests changing norms around discussing bodily functions. From taboo and embarrassment to open discussion and acceptance. Society may become more accepting and open about bodily functions and health-related topics. A push for mental health awareness and body positivity, leading to destigmatization. 3
Interdisciplinary Research Franklin’s proposal for scientific inquiry into flatulence indicates a blend of disciplines. From compartmentalized academic fields to interdisciplinary research initiatives. Increased collaboration across diverse fields to address complex societal issues. Recognition of the interconnectedness of various fields in solving real-world problems. 4
Legacy of Satirical Science Franklin’s essay could inspire future satirical works in scientific literature. From traditional scientific writing to more satirical and engaging formats. Emergence of new genres in scientific literature that combine satire and education. The need for engaging and accessible science communication to capture public interest. 3

Concerns

name description relevancy
Societal Reverence for the Impractical The emphasis on pretentious academic pursuits over practical scientific inquiry could lead to a disconnect between science and real-world problems. 4
Stigmatization of Natural Bodily Functions Franklin’s discussion highlights the societal discomfort with natural bodily functions, which can lead to shame and a lack of acceptance around health issues. 3
Research Prioritization The need for more focus on practical applications of science, such as improving human comfort rather than solely pursuing abstract theories. 4
Misinterpretation of Humor in Academia The use of humor in scientific discourse may be overlooked or misunderstood, potentially hindering engagement with broader audiences. 2
Cultural Attitudes Towards Health Science Changing societal views regarding the study of everyday health issues, like flatulence, could reshape medical research priorities. 3

Behaviors

name description relevancy
Humor in Science Utilizing humor to address serious scientific inquiries, making them more accessible and engaging to the public. 4
Challenging Academic Norms Critiquing the pretentiousness of academic societies by proposing unconventional topics for research. 5
Interdisciplinary Approach Encouraging collaboration between different scientific fields to explore everyday phenomena like flatulence. 3
Public Engagement with Science Promoting scientific discussions through informal channels and personal correspondence to reach a wider audience. 4
Revisiting Historical Contexts Re-examining historical texts and their relevance in contemporary discussions about science and culture. 3

Technologies

description relevancy src
Researching the effects of various foods on the odor of flatulence and developing methods for testing. 3 001b195bbddec8fb0193b668a70aa883
Creating a drug to make flatulence inoffensive or pleasant, potentially impacting dietary sciences. 4 001b195bbddec8fb0193b668a70aa883

Issues

name description relevancy
Cultural Perspectives on Humor The essay highlights how humor, especially regarding bodily functions, can challenge societal norms and expectations about decency and propriety. 3
Scientific Inquiry into Everyday Phenomena Franklin’s proposal for scientific research into flatulence suggests a broader trend of exploring mundane topics for their scientific and practical implications. 4
Historical Context of Scientific Discourse The response to Franklin’s essay indicates an ongoing dialogue about the seriousness and relevance of scientific inquiry across centuries. 2
Perception of Academic Institutions Franklin’s critique of academic societies reflects a recurring theme of questioning the relevance and practicality of academic pursuits in society. 3
Legacy of Satire in Scientific Literature The enduring interest in Franklin’s satirical approach to serious topics exemplifies how satire can influence public discourse and scientific communication. 4