A New Investment Model for Urban Development: The Smart Commons Proposal, (from page 20040714.)
External link
Keywords
- urban planning
- public goods
- property inflation
- High Line
- investment model
- smart commons
Themes
- urban development
- public investment
- land value tax
- community-led investment
- climate transition
Other
- Category: city
- Type: blog post
Summary
This article discusses a new investment model for urban development, highlighting the issues with the current system that often benefits private landowners at the expense of public investment. It critiques the dysfunctional urban development model characterized by ‘state-sponsored speculation’ and analyzes the impact of public projects like New York’s High Line on property values, revealing significant wealth generation for private owners while yielding minimal returns to the public. The proposal for a ‘Smart Commons’ suggests democratizing investment tools, enabling communities to own and invest in local infrastructure projects, thereby promoting equitable growth and addressing climate transition challenges. The article emphasizes the need for innovative investment strategies that prioritize community involvement and sustainable outcomes.
Signals
name |
description |
change |
10-year |
driving-force |
relevancy |
Dysfunctional Urban Development Model |
Current urban investments favor private wealth over community needs. |
Shift from state-sponsored speculation to equitable community investment. |
Cities may prioritize community-led investments and sustainable designs over speculative developments. |
Growing awareness of social equity and the need for sustainable urban environments. |
5 |
High Line Effect |
Public investments like the High Line inflate property values disproportionately. |
Transform public infrastructure funding to ensure local communities benefit from increased property values. |
Public infrastructure may be designed to directly benefit local communities rather than just increase real estate value. |
Desire for fair distribution of value generated by public investments. |
4 |
Smart Commons Investment Model |
Proposed model for community-led urban development. |
Transition from top-down urban planning to more community-driven investment approaches. |
Communities may have greater control over local investments, leading to more equitable outcomes. |
Technological advancements enabling decentralized investment and ownership models. |
5 |
Smart Contracts and Digital Deeds |
Use of technology to automate property transactions and value distribution. |
Move towards more transparent and efficient urban investment processes. |
Property ownership and investment could be radically transformed through blockchain and smart contracts. |
Increased demand for transparency and efficiency in property transactions. |
4 |
Environmental Sustainability in Urban Development |
Need for cities to transition towards sustainable, climate-resilient designs. |
Shift focus from traditional urban designs to those promoting sustainability and community health. |
Urban areas may become greener, more resilient, and focused on social connectivity. |
Urgent need to combat climate change and enhance urban livability. |
5 |
Concerns
name |
description |
relevancy |
Dysfunctional Urban Development Model |
The current approach to urban development disproportionately favors private wealth over public goods, leading to inequality and unsustainable growth. |
5 |
Privatization of Public Investment |
Public investments, like parks and infrastructure, often result in inflated property values, benefitting private landowners rather than the community. |
5 |
Disconnection Between Public Projects and Community Needs |
Large-scale planning fails to address the unique needs of communities, resulting in further marginalization and disconnection from local interests. |
4 |
Inaccurate Property Value Assessments |
Existing methods for calculating land value hinder effective implementation of land value taxes and equitable funding for communities. |
4 |
Land Speculation and Economic Disparity |
The practice of land speculation exacerbates economic inequality, limiting access to affordable housing and essential services. |
5 |
Environmental Resilience |
Urban areas risk increasing vulnerability to climate change impacts without a shift towards sustainable and resilient infrastructural investments. |
5 |
Technological Dependence in Urban Development |
Relying on technology for urban development outcomes may lead to new forms of inequality and disempowerment if not managed inclusively. |
4 |
Behaviors
name |
description |
relevancy |
Community-led investment |
Empowering local citizens to invest in and have a say in urban development projects, ensuring equitable outcomes. |
5 |
Decentralized urban development |
Using technology to decentralize investment and ownership in urban infrastructure, reducing reliance on top-down government models. |
5 |
Smart contracts for property transactions |
Leveraging smart contracts to automate property transactions and manage communal investments in urban infrastructure. |
4 |
Collective wealth sharing |
Reframing property value increases as collective wealth generated by communities, rather than individual profits from speculation. |
5 |
Climate-responsive urban design |
Designing urban environments to be resilient to climate change while promoting social connection and sustainability. |
5 |
Digital property deeds |
Implementing digital property deeds linked to community investments, allowing for easier tracking and sharing of value uplift. |
4 |
Local decision-making platforms |
Creating user-friendly platforms for residents to propose, vote on, and fund local infrastructure projects. |
5 |
Hybrid investment models |
Combining bottom-up community-driven approaches with top-down resource scales for urban development. |
5 |
Technologies
description |
relevancy |
src |
Digital contracts that automatically execute and enforce terms using blockchain technology, enhancing transparency and efficiency in property transactions. |
5 |
20e24f276ca807be7569424d8072a67e |
Blockchain-enabled property deeds that simplify ownership transfers and link investments to property equity, reducing legal complexities. |
4 |
20e24f276ca807be7569424d8072a67e |
Digital platforms allowing local residents to propose, vote for, and fund neighborhood projects, fostering community engagement and investment. |
5 |
20e24f276ca807be7569424d8072a67e |
Automated systems accessing property value datasets to calculate real-time value increases, aiding in fair taxation and investment. |
4 |
20e24f276ca807be7569424d8072a67e |
New investment frameworks that prioritize community ownership and equitable development, challenging traditional speculative financing. |
5 |
20e24f276ca807be7569424d8072a67e |
Localized energy systems that provide renewable energy to communities, promoting sustainability and reducing costs. |
4 |
20e24f276ca807be7569424d8072a67e |
Combining top-down resources with bottom-up community engagement to transform urban infrastructure sustainably and equitably. |
5 |
20e24f276ca807be7569424d8072a67e |
Utilizing geographic information systems (GIS) to inform urban development decisions, enhancing spatial planning and resource management. |
4 |
20e24f276ca807be7569424d8072a67e |
Issues
name |
description |
relevancy |
Dysfunctional Urban Development Models |
Current urban development models prioritize land speculation over sustainable community development, leading to social inequities and environmental degradation. |
5 |
Public Investment and Private Wealth |
Public investments in infrastructure often inflate land values, benefiting private developers rather than the community. |
5 |
Land Value Tax Challenges |
Implementing a Land Value Tax faces political resistance and valuation difficulties, hindering equitable distribution of land wealth. |
4 |
Community-led Urban Development |
Emerging models for community investment and ownership can reshape urban spaces to prioritize local needs and sustainability. |
5 |
Impact of Infrastructure on Property Values |
Public infrastructure projects significantly inflate surrounding property values, often at the expense of affordable housing. |
4 |
Decentralized Investment Models |
Advancements in technology enable local, decentralized investment models that empower communities in urban development. |
4 |
Climate Transition in Urban Planning |
Cities must undergo significant transformations to meet climate goals, requiring innovative investment strategies. |
5 |
Digital Property Deeds and Smart Contracts |
Utilizing smart contracts and digital property deeds could revolutionize property ownership and investment dynamics. |
4 |
Social Trust in Government |
Erosion of trust in centralized governance calls for new models of local decision-making and investment. |
4 |