The central government is set to publish a public register of artificial intelligence and algorithmic tools, following concerns over bias and racism in their use. Campaigners have argued for increased transparency regarding these technologies, which have been applied in areas like fraud detection and immigration controls. Past challenges, including the suspension of a biased visa application algorithm, highlight the potential for discrimination. Although a recording standard for these tools was established, only nine records have been published. There are growing calls for government departments to provide more information on their AI systems and actions to mitigate inherent biases.
| Signal | Change | 10y horizon | Driving force |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI government tools to be publicly registered | From secrecy to transparency | Increased public trust in technology | Demand for accountability and fairness |
| Efforts to combat entrenched racism in AI | From bias to fairness | Systems with reduced discrimination | Public pressure for ethical AI deployment |
| Campaigns challenge algorithmic bias | From unchallenged to scrutinized | Greater regulatory oversight on AI | Advocacy for social justice and equality |
| Implementation of algorithmic transparency standard | From voluntary to mandatory reporting | Comprehensive database on AI tools used | Legal requirements for transparency |
| Public interest in lawful tech adoption | From tech deployment to public trust | Enhanced governance over AI usage | Commitment to ethical governance in tech |
| DWP facing calls for AI operation details | From hidden practices to full disclosure | Clear understanding of AI mechanisms | Need for consumer protection and rights |
| Potential legal action against DWP’s AI use | From passive to litigious environment | Increased accountability for government AI | Legal frameworks ensuring fairness and equity |