Denmark is renowned for its high levels of trust among its citizens, with 74% of Danes believing most people can be trusted. This trust is considered a significant factor contributing to the nation’s wealth, alongside physical and human capital. Danish society is characterized by a low crime rate, minimal corruption, and a welfare system based on mutual trust. Cultural practices, such as leaving babies in prams outside, reflect this trust, as do community structures that foster social bonds. However, Denmark faces challenges regarding inclusion, particularly regarding its immigrant population and policies perceived as exclusionary. Despite these issues, Denmark’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic showcased its strong community spirit and resilience, indicating an ongoing evolution of trust in the country.
| name | description | change | 10-year | driving-force | relevancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerging Trust Capital | Denmark’s high trust levels contribute significantly to its wealth and social cohesion. | Shifting from skepticism in societies to high levels of trust leading to economic stability. | In 10 years, nations may adopt trust-building measures to enhance social and economic outcomes. | The recognition that trust can drive economic growth and societal well-being. | 5 |
| Urban Design and Trust | Denmark’s urban environments foster social interactions and trust among residents. | Transitioning from car-dominated cities to pedestrian-friendly spaces that promote community trust. | Cities worldwide might adopt similar designs to encourage social trust and community engagement. | A growing awareness of how urban design impacts social behavior and community trust. | 4 |
| Welfare State as Trust Framework | Denmark’s welfare model is built on mutual trust among citizens and between citizens and the state. | From minimal support systems to comprehensive welfare that relies on trust and equality. | Other nations may explore similar welfare systems as a means to foster social trust. | The desire for equitable societies and the acknowledgment of social trust’s importance. | 5 |
| Cultural Homogeneity and Trust | Denmark’s historical homogeneity contributes to its high levels of social trust. | Shifting from a homogeneous society to one that is more diverse, impacting social trust dynamics. | Diversity may challenge existing trust paradigms, requiring new strategies for social cohesion. | Increasing migration and globalization leading to more diverse populations. | 4 |
| Integration Challenges in Trust Dynamics | Denmark grapples with integrating migrants into a traditionally homogeneous society. | Transitioning from exclusionary policies to more inclusive practices that foster trust. | Future policies may focus on inclusion to maintain social trust in diverse societies. | The need for social cohesion in an increasingly diverse demographic landscape. | 5 |
| Pandemic Impact on Social Interactions | COVID-19 has altered social dynamics, leading to increased sociability post-pandemic in Denmark. | From isolation and social distancing to revitalized community interactions and trust. | Long-term changes in social behavior may lead to stronger community bonds. | The shared experience of the pandemic leading to a renewed appreciation for community. | 4 |
| Democratic Deficit Awareness | Recent decisions in Denmark have sparked discussions on democratic processes and accountability. | Shifting from unquestioned trust in authority to a demand for accountability and transparency. | Increased scrutiny of governmental decisions may reshape trust in public institutions. | A growing awareness of the need for democratic accountability in society. | 4 |
| name | description | relevancy |
|---|---|---|
| Decreasing Social Cohesion | As Denmark becomes more diverse, there may be challenges in maintaining social trust and cohesion, potentially leading to divisions within the community. | 4 |
| Racial and Ethnic Inclusion | Increasing migration may strain existing social ties and challenge perceptions of Danish identity, affecting the integration of non-white residents. | 4 |
| Welfare State Viability | The sustainability of Denmark’s universal welfare model could be threatened by socioeconomic inequalities, especially as global neoliberal trends grow. | 5 |
| Democratic Deficit | Rapid policy changes, such as those regarding the mink cull, could lead to perceptions of diminished public trust in democratic processes. | 4 |
| Exposure to Misinformation | As political polarization increases, collective responses to misinformation could weaken the societal trust that has been built over time. | 3 |
| Economic Inequality | Growth in economic disparities could undermine the foundation of trust and equality that has characterized Danish society. | 4 |
| name | description | relevancy |
|---|---|---|
| High Social Trust | A majority of Danes believe in the trustworthiness of others, impacting social interactions and community dynamics. | 5 |
| Trust in Institutions | Danes exhibit high levels of trust in government and public institutions, reducing corruption and promoting civic engagement. | 5 |
| Community-Centric Living | Urban design promotes communal living, enhancing social interactions and trust among residents. | 4 |
| Child Independence | Children are allowed significant freedom to explore independently, reflecting societal trust in community safety. | 4 |
| Cultural Homogeneity and Trust | A historically homogeneous population fosters strong social bonds, impacting trust dynamics in society. | 4 |
| Evolving National Identity | Discussions around inclusion and integration are reshaping the concept of Danish identity, affecting social trust. | 4 |
| Resilience During Crisis | Denmark’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic showcased strong community spirit and trust in public health measures. | 4 |
| Welfare System Trust | The welfare model based on mutual trust supports citizens’ rights to services and promotes equality. | 5 |
| Social Responsibility in Public Spaces | A culture of looking after shared spaces and belongings, such as bikes, reflects high trust levels in society. | 4 |
| Adaptation to Diversity | Ongoing negotiations around belonging and identity as Denmark diversifies, impacting social cohesion and trust. | 4 |
| name | description | relevancy |
|---|---|---|
| QR Code Technology | Utilized in Danish charity shops for secure access and transactions, showcasing trust in unattended spaces. | 4 |
| Environmental Urban Design | Implementing block typology and communal spaces to enhance social interaction and trust among residents. | 5 |
| Welfare State Model | Denmark’s universal welfare system based on mutual trust and equality, providing citizens with essential benefits. | 5 |
| Community-Centric Transportation | Bicycles as a primary means of transportation, emphasizing sustainability and social trust in public spaces. | 4 |
| Digital Community Engagement | Use of apps and online platforms to facilitate community trust and engagement during events like the pandemic. | 3 |
| Educational Innovations | State-subsidized efterskole and folk high schools promoting community living and character development. | 4 |
| name | description | relevancy |
|---|---|---|
| Evolving Trust Dynamics | The changing nature of trust in Danish society as it grapples with increasing diversity and migration. | 5 |
| Impact of Neoliberalism on Equality | The influence of global neoliberal trends on Denmark’s traditionally high levels of equality and social trust. | 4 |
| Integration of Migrants | Challenges and strategies in integrating a diverse population while maintaining social cohesion and trust. | 5 |
| Social Policy and Racism | The implications of Denmark’s ghetto policy and its impact on social trust and community cohesion. | 4 |
| Post-Pandemic Social Behavior | Shifts in social interactions and community spirit following the pandemic, influencing social trust. | 3 |
| Urban Planning and Social Trust | The role of urban design in fostering social trust and community interaction in Danish cities. | 3 |
| Democratic Accountability | Concerns regarding democratic processes and accountability in decision-making, highlighted by the mink culling incident. | 4 |