Embracing the Power of Subtraction: A Call for Balance in Change Management, (from page 20221012.)
External link
Keywords
- subtraction
- addition
- change
- innovation
- psychology
- systemic change
- decision making
Themes
- subtraction
- addition
- change
- innovation
- psychology
Other
- Category: science
- Type: research article
Summary
The text discusses the neglect of subtractive changes in various systems, highlighting how people instinctively lean towards adding rather than subtracting, despite the potential benefits of subtraction. Research featured in Nature demonstrates that while subtraction can be as effective as addition, it is often overlooked. The author argues for a shift in mindset from thinking in terms of ‘add or subtract’ to ‘add and subtract,’ suggesting that both approaches can be complementary in fostering change. Examples like pocket parks illustrate the power of subtraction in improving environments. The piece encourages embracing subtraction as a valuable tool in rethinking personal, organizational, and societal structures.
Signals
name |
description |
change |
10-year |
driving-force |
relevancy |
Shift Towards Subtraction |
Growing recognition of the value of subtractive changes in various systems. |
From a culture of adding to a balanced approach of adding and subtracting. |
In 10 years, we could see a shift in design and policy towards more subtractive solutions. |
The need for efficiency and clarity in complex systems drives this change. |
4 |
Cultural Resistance to Subtraction |
Awareness of cultural conditioning that favors addition over subtraction. |
From a society that rewards adding complexity to one that values simplicity and clarity. |
In a decade, cultural narratives may shift towards valuing simplicity and strategic removal. |
Increased complexity in daily life may motivate a desire for simplicity and efficiency. |
3 |
Emerging Design Philosophies |
New design practices that integrate subtraction as a key principle. |
From traditional design emphasizing addition to innovative designs that prioritize subtraction. |
Designs may increasingly emphasize minimalism and functionality through subtraction. |
Consumer demand for simplicity and usability will drive this design shift. |
4 |
Subtraction in Urban Planning |
Implementation of pocket parks and similar concepts in urban environments. |
From urban sprawl and complexity to more intentional, subtractive urban designs. |
Cities may prioritize green spaces and community areas through subtractive planning. |
The push for livable cities amid population growth will encourage innovative urban design. |
5 |
Mindset Shift in Organizations |
Organizations beginning to adopt an add and subtract mindset for efficiency. |
From an overwhelming focus on adding tasks to a balanced approach of task management. |
Organizations may operate more efficiently with a focus on essential tasks and roles. |
The need for productivity and employee well-being will drive this mindset change. |
4 |
Concerns
name |
description |
relevancy |
Over-Reliance on Addition |
The instinct to add complexity may overshadow the equally important approach of subtraction, leading to ineffective systems. |
5 |
Complex Regulatory Frameworks |
Increasingly lengthy federal regulations limit innovative subtractive changes, creating barriers to improvement. |
4 |
Lost Opportunities for Subtractive Innovations |
Neglecting the potential of subtraction could stifle new ideas and solutions in various fields including urban planning and technology. |
4 |
Cognitive Bias towards Addition |
Cognitive biases favoring addition over subtraction in decision-making can hinder problem-solving capabilities. |
5 |
Cultural Norms Favoring Accumulation |
A culture that emphasizes accumulation over simplification may lead to overwhelming complexity in personal, organizational, and societal contexts. |
4 |
Underutilization of Subtractive Design |
Failure to leverage subtractive design principles leads to missed chances for creating more effective and efficient systems. |
5 |
Misunderstanding of Addition vs. Subtraction |
The false dichotomy between addition and subtraction could obstruct collaborative and innovative approaches to problem-solving. |
3 |
Behaviors
name |
description |
relevancy |
Subtractive Thinking |
A shift from primarily additive approaches to recognizing the value of subtraction in problem-solving and innovation. |
5 |
Dual Approach to Change |
Emphasizing the need to integrate both adding and subtracting in processes rather than viewing them in opposition. |
5 |
Mindful Simplification |
The growing trend of intentionally removing unnecessary elements in design, schedules, and systems for improved clarity and functionality. |
4 |
Cultural Shift Towards Minimalism |
A societal movement towards valuing less complexity and more simplicity in various aspects of life, including urban design and personal productivity. |
4 |
Holistic Problem Solving |
Adopting a comprehensive view that considers all aspects of a problem, including what can be removed, not just what can be added. |
5 |
Technologies
name |
description |
relevancy |
Subtractive Design |
An approach emphasizing the importance of subtraction in design and problem-solving, fostering simplicity and efficiency over complexity. |
5 |
Pocket Parks |
Small green spaces in urban areas created by removing derelict structures, enhancing livability and community engagement. |
4 |
Mindful Scheduling |
A practice of balancing adding and subtracting commitments to optimize productivity and mental well-being. |
4 |
Evolutionary Design Principles |
Design strategies that incorporate both additive and subtractive elements for more effective solutions. |
3 |
Issues
name |
description |
relevancy |
Neglect of Subtractive Changes |
The tendency to focus on adding rather than subtracting in systems, potentially overlooking effective solutions. |
5 |
Cultural Conditioning Towards Addition |
Societal norms and structures that reward adding complexity, influencing decision-making processes. |
4 |
Misunderstanding of Complementary Approaches |
The false dichotomy between adding and subtracting hinders the recognition of their complementary nature in problem-solving. |
4 |
Untapped Potential in Subtraction |
The opportunities for improvement that arise from embracing subtractive approaches, which are often overlooked. |
5 |
Mental Shortcuts and Instincts |
The cognitive biases that lead individuals to prioritize adding over subtracting, affecting creativity and efficiency. |
3 |
Impact of Regulations and Complexity |
The increasing length and complexity of regulations and processes that could benefit from simplification through subtraction. |
4 |
Subtractive Design in Urban Planning |
The role of subtractive design in creating more livable urban environments, exemplified by pocket parks. |
4 |