Understanding Coordination Neglect: Cognitive Challenges in Organizational Effectiveness, (from page 20220711.)
External link
Keywords
- coordination
- organizational behavior
- communication
- integration
- cognitive theories
- Chip Heath
- Nancy Staudenmayer
Themes
- coordination neglect
- lay theories
- organization
- communication
- integration
- cognitive phenomena
Other
- Category: science
- Type: research article
Summary
The article discusses how coordination neglect in organizations arises from individuals’ lay theories about organizing. It highlights two main cognitive issues: partition focus, where individuals prioritize dividing tasks over integrating them, and inadequate communication, exacerbated by the ‘curse of knowledge,’ making it difficult for specialists to communicate across fields. This neglect leads to ineffective organization, even among highly motivated individuals, as evidenced by historical examples like Xerox’s struggles to market new technologies. The authors argue that for effective coordination, organizations must address these cognitive shortcomings to improve task division and integration processes.
Signals
name |
description |
change |
10-year |
driving-force |
relevancy |
Coordination Neglect in Organizations |
The phenomenon where individuals fail to effectively coordinate due to lay theories. |
Shifting from a focus on task division to a more integrated approach to coordination. |
Organizations may adopt new frameworks that emphasize integration over division in task management. |
The need for more effective communication and collaboration in increasingly complex organizational environments. |
4 |
Specialization and Communication Barriers |
Specialists struggle to communicate across different areas, hampering integration efforts. |
Moving from highly specialized roles to more collaborative and communicative structures. |
Teams may become more interdisciplinary, fostering better communication and integration. |
The recognition that effective communication is essential for successful organizational outcomes. |
5 |
Impact of Technology on Organizational Structures |
Historical examples show how technology shifts can complicate organizational structures. |
Transitioning from traditional to digital forms of organization and communication. |
Organizations may become more agile and adaptable in response to rapid technological changes. |
The continuous evolution of technology necessitates adaptive organizational structures. |
4 |
Motivation vs. Organization Effectiveness |
Highly motivated individuals can still fail at effective organization. |
Recognizing that motivation alone does not guarantee effective teamwork and organization. |
Focus on holistic approaches that integrate motivation with effective organizational strategies. |
Understanding the complexities of human behavior and teamwork in organizational contexts. |
3 |
Concerns
name |
description |
relevancy |
Coordination Neglect |
Organizations may fail to effectively organize due to lay theories, leading to insufficient integration of tasks and communication problems. |
5 |
Partition Focus |
Individuals may overly focus on dividing tasks rather than integrating them, resulting in inefficiencies and coordination failures. |
4 |
Communication Barriers among Specialists |
Inadequate communication due to specialists’ inability to understand and connect with each other’s work can severely hinder organizational effectiveness. |
5 |
Complex Organizational Structures |
Diversification and complexity in organizational structures can lead to a lack of clear operational pathways, exacerbating coordination issues. |
4 |
Curse of Knowledge |
Knowledge specialization can create communication gaps and hinder perspective-taking, leading to ineffective collaboration. |
5 |
Behaviors
name |
description |
relevancy |
Coordination Neglect |
Organizations struggle with effective coordination due to individuals’ lay theories focusing more on task division than integration. |
5 |
Partition Focus |
Individuals prioritize partitioning tasks over integrating components, leading to ineffective organization. |
4 |
Component Focus |
A tendency to concentrate on individual components rather than the interrelated capabilities necessary for task completion. |
4 |
Inadequate Communication |
Individuals often fail to communicate effectively, exacerbated by the curse of knowledge and specialization barriers. |
5 |
Specialization Barriers |
Specialists have difficulty communicating with one another, hindering the integration of diverse expertise. |
4 |
Complicated Organizational Structures |
Managers create overly complex structures that hinder the effective organization of tasks and communication. |
4 |
Motivation vs. Organization |
Highly motivated individuals still struggle to organize effectively, indicating a disconnect between motivation and organizational success. |
5 |
Technologies
name |
description |
relevancy |
Desktop PCs |
Personal computers with a graphical interface that revolutionized personal and office computing. |
4 |
Networking Technologies |
Technologies that allow computers to connect and communicate over a network, enhancing collaboration and efficiency. |
5 |
Email Communication |
A digital communication method that transformed how individuals and organizations exchange information. |
5 |
Specialized Software Development |
The creation of software tailored for specific tasks, which can lead to complexities in organization and communication. |
3 |
Task Integration Mechanisms |
Methods and systems designed to integrate different components of tasks effectively within organizations. |
4 |
Issues
name |
description |
relevancy |
Coordination Neglect in Organizations |
Organizations struggle with effective coordination due to individuals’ lay theories focusing on task division over integration. |
4 |
Communication Barriers in Specialized Teams |
Specialists face challenges in communicating with peers from different areas, hindering task integration and overall efficiency. |
5 |
Over-Specialization Risks |
A tendency towards high specialization can lead to inadequate communication and coordination, impacting overall organizational performance. |
4 |
Impact of Lay Theories on Organizational Structure |
Individuals’ preconceived notions about organizing can complicate the design of effective organizational structures. |
4 |
Historical Lessons from Organizational Failures |
Past organizational failures, such as at Xerox, highlight the importance of adapting structures to technological changes. |
3 |