Investigation Reveals Disturbing Targeted Killings of Doghmosh Family by Israeli Snipers in Gaza, (from page 20250928d.)
External link
Keywords
- Salem Doghmosh
- Daniel Raab
- sniper killings
- Gaza City
- November 2023
Themes
- Israeli snipers
- Gaza conflict
- civilian casualties
- Doghmosh family
- investigation
Other
- Category: politics
- Type: news
Summary
A thorough investigation reveals the tragic killings of the Doghmosh family in Gaza by Israeli snipers, where four family members were killed in a series of targeted shootings on November 22, 2023. This includes 19-year-old Salem, who was shot while trying to retrieve his brother’s body, and their father, Montasser, who was also shot while approaching the scene. The investigation highlights a pattern of Israeli troops treating unarmed men in Gaza as targets, with claims that such actions might constitute war crimes under international law. The sniper, Daniel Raab, described the killings with a disturbing nonchalance, indicating a belief that civilians returning to collect bodies were legitimate targets. The findings add to growing concerns regarding potential genocide against Palestinian civilians.
Signals
name |
description |
change |
10-year |
driving-force |
relevancy |
Normalization of Targeting Unarmed Civilians |
Israeli snipers treat unarmed individuals as legitimate targets without accountability. |
Shift in military engagement rules from protection to open targeting without justification. |
Potential erosion of international law protections for civilians, leading to increased legitimacy of violence in conflicts. |
A militarized mindset among soldiers who perceive unarmed civilians as threats within combat zones. |
5 |
Desensitization to Violence |
Military personnel express indifference to the deaths of unarmed civilians, highlighting a troubling emotional disconnect. |
From a combat ethics viewpoint valuing human life to a mindset that sees death as routine. |
Increased willingness among soldiers to act violently without moral hesitation, normalizing violence in warfare. |
Exposure to prolonged conflict situations that diminish empathy and moral judgement. |
4 |
Evolving Justifications for Killings |
Use of vague terms like ‘security perimeter’ to justify shootings of unarmed civilians. |
Transition from specific targeting regulations to broad justifications that allow for civil casualties. |
Legal frameworks may be increasingly exploited to permit civilian deaths under ambiguous security claims. |
A changing narrative in military operations that prioritizes operational success over humanitarian considerations. |
4 |
Emergence of Citizen Journalism |
Reports by independent journalists increase scrutiny of military actions and highlight accountability. |
Shift from state-controlled narratives to diverse citizen-led documentation of military conduct. |
Greater impact on international law enforcement and human rights accountability as independent evidence becomes prevalent. |
Advancements in technology enabling broader access to information and video evidence from conflict zones. |
5 |
Psychological Impact on Survivors |
Survivors of shootings express an emotional and psychological toll that persist over time. |
From immediate reaction to long-term mental health implications for families affected by violence. |
Increased prevalence of PTSD and trauma-related issues in communities affected by conflict, influencing social structures. |
Continuous exposure to violence leading to chronic mental health challenges in impacted populations. |
4 |
Concerns
name |
description |
Targeting Unarmed Civilians |
The pattern of Israeli snipers targeting unarmed civilians, including those attempting to retrieve bodies, raises serious human rights and ethical concerns. |
Normalization of Violence |
The casual admission of killing unarmed individuals by soldiers reflects a troubling normalization of lethal violence in military operations. |
Impunity for War Crimes |
The failure to hold military personnel accountable for possible war crimes contributes to a culture of impunity in conflict zones. |
Dehumanization in Warfare |
The framing of unarmed Palestinians as legitimate targets based on arbitrary ‘security perimeters’ highlights dehumanization in modern warfare practices. |
Impact on Community Trauma |
The psychological impact and trauma on surviving family members and communities due to lethal military actions against civilians is a significant concern for long-term stability. |
Manipulation of Media Narratives |
The use of footage of killings to celebrate military actions raises questions about ethics in war reporting and the manipulation of public perception. |
Behaviors
name |
description |
Desensitization to Violence |
Individuals, like sniper Raab, exhibit a troubling detachment from the violence they inflict, seeing it as routine rather than a moral dilemma. |
Normalization of Targeting Civilians |
Military personnel perceive unarmed civilians as legitimate targets based on arbitrary criteria, reinforcing a culture of violence against civilians. |
Using Technology for Justification |
The employment of drone footage and other technologies to capture and celebrate lethal actions indicates a shift in how military violence is perceived and documented. |
Normalization of ‘Combat Zones’ |
Defining areas as ‘combat zones’ without proper notification leads to the automatic designation of individuals as enemies, allowing for indiscriminate violence. |
Celebration of Lethal Actions |
Videos created by soldiers to celebrate their actions in combat indicate an emerging culture that glorifies violence and the loss of life. |
Dehumanization of Victims |
The perception of victims, like the Doghmosh family, as mere statistics or collateral damage reflects a significant loss of empathy in military engagements. |
Impunity in Military Operations |
A prevailing sense of immunity among soldiers for actions considered war crimes supports an environment where violations occur frequently without consequence. |
Technologies
name |
description |
Drone Technology |
Drones used for surveillance and targeted operations in conflict zones. |
Satellite Imagery |
Geolocation and tracking capabilities using satellite technology to monitor military actions. |
Facial Recognition Technology |
Used to identify individuals from video footage, aiding in investigations of military actions. |
Remote Medical Technologies |
Technologies focused on remote medical response and body retrieval in conflict areas. |
Geolocation Tools |
Tools that enable mapping and tracking of events in real-time for investigative purposes. |
Issues
name |
description |
Targeted killings of unarmed civilians |
Patterns of Israeli snipers targeting unarmed individuals trying to recover bodies raises significant ethical and legal questions. |
Invisible security perimeters in conflict zones |
The establishment of invisible lines for engagement puts civilians at risk and normalizes shootings of unarmed individuals. |
Impact of military training on civilian interactions |
Former soldiers discussing normalized violence against civilians highlights concerns about military training and its implications on human rights. |
Accountability for war crimes |
The investigation into potential war crimes committed by military personnel calls for international scrutiny and the need for legal accountability. |
Psychological impact on soldiers |
The implications of soldiers boasting about killings indicate a potential desensitization towards violence and trauma. |
Civilians’ right to dignified burials |
The need for dignified treatment of the deceased highlights the humanitarian concerns during military conflicts. |
The role of social media in documenting violence |
The use of footage shared online for glorification of violence raises ethical questions about representation and accountability. |
The effects of war on familial structures |
The destruction of families due to targeted violence emphasizes the broader social implications of conflict on communities. |