Between 2005 and 2010, the anonymous book series “Project Russia” was distributed to influential figures in Russia, proposing a plan for spiritual warfare against Western democracies and advocating for a controlled global collapse. Attributed to Yuriy Shalyganov, linked to the FSB, the series argues that democracies are decadent and morally inferior, calling for a new supranational state led by a morally superior elite. The authors foresee the collapse of the U.S. dollar and the establishment of a global autocracy under Putin, Xi Jinping, and allies like Elon Musk. They emphasize the need for a single world religion to support their vision, while warning of potential chaos in the U.S. political landscape and urging a defense of democratic values against this threat.
| name | description | change | 10-year | driving-force | relevancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rise of Supranational Autocracy | The emergence of a global governance structure led by a select elite. | Shift from national democracies to a centralized supranational authority under autocratic leadership. | In ten years, global governance may see a consolidation of power among a few elite leaders. | Increasing disillusionment with democratic systems and a desire for strong, centralized leadership. | 4 |
| Destabilization of the US Dollar | Growing calls for the collapse of the dollar and the current financial system. | Transition from dollar hegemony to alternative currency systems amid economic instability. | The US dollar may lose its status as the world’s primary reserve currency, leading to economic shifts. | Economic discontent and the rise of alternative currency models like cryptocurrencies. | 5 |
| Hybrid Warfare Strategies | Russia’s use of hybrid warfare techniques to undermine democracies. | From traditional military confrontations to subversive tactics targeting societal divisions. | Many democracies may struggle to maintain social cohesion due to internal divisions exacerbated by external influence. | Desire to weaken perceived enemies and promote alternative ideologies. | 5 |
| Influence of Elite Figures | Prominent individuals advocating for destabilization of democratic institutions. | Shift from traditional political structures to influence by business moguls and populist figures. | Influence of non-traditional leaders like Elon Musk may reshape political landscapes and governance. | Strategic interests of wealthy individuals seeking to reshape political and economic systems. | 4 |
| Crisis of American Institutions | Potential inability of US institutions to withstand emerging threats. | From functioning democratic institutions to potential collapse or radical transformation. | American institutions may be significantly weakened or transformed, impacting governance and civil rights. | Increased polarization and erosion of trust in democratic processes and institutions. | 5 |
| Call for a Universal Religion | A push towards establishing a single belief system to unify governance. | Shift from pluralistic society to a monolithic religious framework governing political ideologies. | Society may experience a blending of religious doctrines influencing global governance and policies. | Desire for moral justification and unity in an increasingly fractured world. | 3 |
| name | description | relevancy |
|---|---|---|
| Authoritarianism Rising | The potential rise of a supranational autocracy led by Putin, undermining democratic institutions globally. | 5 |
| Destabilization of Economies | The drive for a controlled global collapse may lead to severe economic destabilization, particularly affecting the US dollar and economic health globally. | 5 |
| Manipulation of Democratic Institutions | The risk of foreign influence, particularly by Russia, manipulating democratic processes and institutions in the U.S. and beyond. | 4 |
| Societal Division | Promotion of societal divisions as a method to weaken democracies and strengthen authoritarian agendas. | 4 |
| Single Global Religion | Imposition of a singular religious ideology as a means to unify and justify authoritarian rule. | 4 |
| Rise of Extremist Narratives | Emergence of extremist ideologies against democracy, potentially mobilizing a significant population against democratic values. | 4 |
| Crisis Management Failure | Potential failure of institutions to respond adequately to destabilization and crisis, risking a breakdown of societal order. | 5 |
| Economic Vulnerability of Individuals | In times of economic chaos, vulnerable populations, like disabled retirees, face increased risks with their financial security. | 4 |
| Geopolitical Alliances | Strengthening alliances between authoritarian figures such as Putin and Xi Jinping that could reshape global power dynamics. | 4 |
| name | description | relevancy |
|---|---|---|
| Promotion of Supranational Governance | Advocating for a global autocracy led by a select elite, challenging the sovereignty of nation-states. | 5 |
| Destabilization of Democratic Institutions | Encouraging societal divisions and distrust in democratic processes to weaken their effectiveness. | 5 |
| Rise of Alternative Currency Models | Support for cryptocurrency and other non-Federal Reserve currencies as a means to challenge traditional financial systems. | 4 |
| Emphasis on Moral Superiority | Framing Russia’s stance as morally superior to democracies, promoting a narrative of righteousness in global conflicts. | 4 |
| Religious Syncretism as Political Tool | Utilizing a blend of religious ideologies to unify followers under a singular belief system supporting autocratic governance. | 4 |
| Accelerationist Agenda in Politics | Leveraging political chaos and economic instability to further personal and nationalistic agendas. | 5 |
| Manipulation of Public Perception | Using disinformation and propaganda to shape public opinion against established democratic norms. | 5 |
| Exploitation of Economic Vulnerabilities | Targeting financial weaknesses, such as the US dollar, to induce systemic collapse and gain leverage. | 5 |
| description | relevancy | src |
|---|---|---|
| A strategy that blends conventional military might with information warfare and social manipulation to achieve political objectives. | 5 | c6282001859f79cec55dfb5c2dc84401 |
| A proposed global governance structure led by a single authority, potentially undermining national sovereignty and democracy. | 4 | c6282001859f79cec55dfb5c2dc84401 |
| Alternative currencies that challenge traditional financial systems, gaining traction among political figures and movements. | 5 | c6282001859f79cec55dfb5c2dc84401 |
| The strategic use of information and misinformation to influence public perception and political outcomes. | 5 | c6282001859f79cec55dfb5c2dc84401 |
| The idea of establishing a single belief system to unify diverse populations under a common moral framework. | 3 | c6282001859f79cec55dfb5c2dc84401 |
| name | description | relevancy |
|---|---|---|
| Rise of Supranational Autocracy | The potential establishment of a global autocracy led by figures like Putin, Musk, and Xi, undermining democratic systems. | 5 |
| Destabilization of Global Dollar System | Efforts to destabilize the U.S. dollar and global financial systems, possibly leading to economic collapse. | 5 |
| Influence of Technology Leaders in Geopolitics | The increasing involvement of tech leaders like Elon Musk in political and geopolitical matters, shaping global agendas. | 4 |
| Hybrid Warfare Tactics | The use of hybrid warfare strategies to promote societal divisions and undermine democracies, particularly in the U.S. | 5 |
| Emerging Religious Syncretism | The development of a new, unified religious ideology as a foundation for global governance, potentially led by the Russian Orthodox Church. | 4 |
| Challenges to Democratic Institutions | The potential inability of democratic institutions to respond effectively to emerging authoritarian threats. | 5 |
| Public Manipulation and Misinformation | The risk of misinformation and public manipulation in shaping perceptions of democracy and governance. | 4 |
| Crisis of American Values | The potential erosion of American democratic values and how they may respond to authoritarian pressures. | 4 |