Tesla’s Wall Connector Hacked: Highlights from the Pwn2Own Competition, (from page 20250223.)
External link
Keywords
- Tesla
- hacking
- vulnerabilities
- Pwn2Own
- automotive hacking
Themes
- hacking
- automotive security
- Tesla
- cybersecurity
- Pwn2Own
Other
- Category: technology
- Type: news
Summary
Recent hacking events have shown that automobiles, particularly Tesla, are increasingly targeted by hackers. During the Pwn2Own hacking competition in Tokyo, hackers successfully compromised Tesla’s Wall Connector on multiple occasions, earning a total of $129,500 in bounties. Notable exploits include a zero-day vulnerability by the PHP Hooligans, who crashed the wall charger for a $50,000 reward, and inventive logic flaws exploited by the Synacktiv team for $45,000. Additionally, two other teams used known vulnerabilities to attack the charger, earning them $22,500 and $12,500, respectively. This incident underscores the growing threat of automotive hacking and the need for robust cybersecurity measures.
Signals
name |
description |
change |
10-year |
driving-force |
relevancy |
Automotive Hacking Events |
Pwn2Own hosts competitive hacking events focusing on automotive vulnerabilities. |
Shift from traditional tech targets to include automotive systems like Tesla. |
Automotive hacking may become a standard focus area in cybersecurity competitions. |
Increasing reliance on technology in vehicles and the need for enhanced security measures. |
4 |
Rise in Automotive Vulnerabilities |
Reports indicate increasing vulnerabilities in automotive systems, specifically in Tesla and Mercedes-Benz. |
Transition from ignoring car cybersecurity to prioritizing it due to reported hacks. |
Automotive manufacturers will likely invest heavily in cybersecurity measures and protocols. |
Growing incidents of hacks targeting vehicles, raising consumer awareness and concern. |
5 |
Bounties for Zero-Day Exploits |
Hackers earning significant rewards for discovering zero-day exploits in automotive systems. |
Increase in financial incentives for hackers to target automotive vulnerabilities. |
Automotive companies may establish ongoing bounty programs for vulnerability discovery. |
Need for manufacturers to secure their products against rising hacking threats. |
4 |
Concerns
name |
description |
relevancy |
Automotive Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities |
Hackers are increasingly targeting vehicles, exposing significant vulnerabilities that can threaten user safety and privacy. |
5 |
Zero-Day Exploits in Critical Systems |
The proliferation of zero-day exploits highlights the urgent need for robust security measures in critical infrastructure like automotive systems. |
5 |
Incentivization of Hacking Events |
Competitions that reward hackers may inadvertently encourage more aggressive hacking tactics against vulnerable systems. |
4 |
Public Safety Risks from Hacked Vehicles |
Hacks on automotive systems can lead to serious safety risks, potentially compromising control of the vehicle and endangering occupants. |
5 |
Delayed Disclosure of Vulnerabilities |
The 90-day window for disclosing vulnerabilities post-exploit could leave systems exposed to malicious actors during this period. |
4 |
Dependency on Manufacturer Responsiveness |
The reliance on manufacturers like Tesla to quickly patch vulnerabilities after identification presents risks if response times are inadequate. |
4 |
Behaviors
name |
description |
relevancy |
Automotive Hacking |
Increasing focus on hacking vehicles, highlighting vulnerabilities in automotive systems and their susceptibility to cyberattacks. |
5 |
Competitive Hacking Events |
Growth of competitive hacking events like Pwn2Own, emphasizing collaborative and ethical hacking to identify vulnerabilities. |
4 |
Monetization of Hacking Skills |
Hackers earning significant bounties for discovering vulnerabilities, showcasing the financial incentives in cybersecurity. |
5 |
Zero-Day Exploits in Automotive |
Rising instances of zero-day exploits specifically targeting automotive technologies, indicating a shift in hacker focus. |
5 |
Collaborative Security Research |
Increased collaboration among ethical hackers and researchers during events to improve security measures across industries. |
4 |
Technologies
description |
relevancy |
src |
Exploits using vulnerabilities unknown to the vendor, often used in competitive hacking events like Pwn2Own. |
5 |
d06afe4260c7035e564077936d8556ff |
Targeting vulnerabilities in vehicles, particularly electric cars like Tesla, showcasing the need for cybersecurity in the automotive industry. |
5 |
d06afe4260c7035e564077936d8556ff |
Combining multiple vulnerabilities to exploit a system, demonstrating sophisticated hacking techniques. |
4 |
d06afe4260c7035e564077936d8556ff |
Events like Pwn2Own that incentivize ethical hackers to discover and report vulnerabilities. |
4 |
d06afe4260c7035e564077936d8556ff |
Addressing security issues in smart chargers and electric vehicle infrastructure. |
4 |
d06afe4260c7035e564077936d8556ff |
Issues
name |
description |
relevancy |
Automotive Hacking |
The increasing targeting of vehicles, like Tesla and Mercedes-Benz, highlights vulnerabilities in automotive technology and potential safety risks. |
5 |
Zero-Day Exploits in Automotive Technology |
The use of zero-day exploits in automotive systems poses significant security threats, necessitating improved defenses against unknown vulnerabilities. |
4 |
Hacking Competitions and Their Implications |
Events like Pwn2Own demonstrate both the prowess of ethical hackers and the growing focus on automotive security, raising awareness of potential risks. |
4 |
Vulnerability Disclosure Delays |
The 90-day delay in disclosing vulnerabilities post-exploit raises concerns about timely fixes and ongoing risks to consumers. |
3 |
Integration of Charging Infrastructure Security |
The compromise of charging infrastructure, like Tesla’s Wall Connector, signals a need for enhanced security measures in EV charging systems. |
4 |